Preview

Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics

Advanced search

Complex Processing of Lidar Survey Data of Marine Areas

https://doi.org/10.59887/fpg/26nu-3hte-3n48

Abstract

The complex processing of data from the shipborne lidar survey of the Black Sea coastal areas was carried out. In this area, internal waves are often observed according to contact and satellite observations. The source of probing linearly polarized laser pulses in the lidar is a solid-state laser with diode pumping of the YAG: Nd active element with a pulse power of 20 mJ at a wavelength of 532 nm and a duration of 7 ns. The co- and cross-polarized components of the echo signal were recorded during the lidar survey. The cross-polarized component of the echo signal was mainly used due to its greater sensitivity to various kinds of inhomogeneities in the vertical distribution of hydrooptical characteristics. The purpose of processing is to identify quasi-periodic structures in the spatial distribution of the characteristics of lidar echo signals caused the propagation of short-period internal waves. Three processing methods were applied: the approximation method, the wavelet analysis method, and the Hilbert-Huang transform method. A large array of data obtained during 50 hours of lidar survey has been processed. Three 60-minute tracks containing quasi-periodic structures have been identified. The three processing methods results are in good agreement with each other and make it possible to obtain the most complete information about the parameters of the studied processes. The parameters of the recorded quasi-periodic processes are typical for internal waves observed in the coastal areas of the Black Sea. In the future, when processing a large amount of lidar sounding data, it is advisable to carry out fast processing by automated spectral methods at the first stage, and to carry out detailed processing by the approximation method only for those survey areas where quasi-periodic processes have been identified.

About the Authors

V. A. Glukhov
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



Yu. A. Goldin
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



G. V. Zhegulin
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



M. A. Rodionov
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



References

1. Vasilkov A.P., Goldin Yu.A., Gureev B.A., Hoge F.E., Swift R.N., and Wright C.W. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean. Applied Optics. 2001, 40, 4353–4364. doi:10.1364/AO.40.004353

2. Churnside J.H., Donaghay P.L. Thin scattering layers observed by airborne lidar. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2009, 66(4), 778–789. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp029

3. Collister B.L., Zimmerman R.C., Hill V.J., Sukenik C.I., Balch W.M. Polarized lidar and ocean particles: insights from a mesoscale coccolithophore bloom. Applied Optics. 2020, 59(15), 4650–4662. doi:10.1364/AO.389845

4. Churnside J.H., Brown E.D., Parker-Stetter S., Horne J.K., Hunt G.L., Hillgruber N., Sigler M.F., Vollenweider J.J. Airborne remote sensing of a biological hot spot in the southeastern Bering Sea. Remote Sensing. 2011, 3(3), 621–637. doi:10.3390/rs3030621

5. Goldin Y.A., Vasilev A.N., Lisovskiy A.S., Chernook V.I. Results of Barents Sea airborne lidar survey. Proceedings SPIE. Current Research on Remote Sensing, Laser Probing, and Imagery in Natural Waters (13 April 2007). 2007, 6615E, 126– 136. doi:10.1117/12.740456

6. Zhong C., Chen P., Pan D. An improved adaptive subsurface phytoplankton layer detection method for ocean lidar data. Remote Sensing. 2021, 13(19), 3875. doi:10.3390/rs13193875

7. Churnside J.H., Ostrovsky L.A. Lidar observation of a strongly nonlinear internal wave train in the Gulf of Alaska. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2005, 26(1), 167–177. doi:10.1080/01431160410001735076

8. Bukin O.A., Major A.Y., Pavlov A.N., Shevtsov B.M., Kholodkevich E.D. Measurement of the lightscattering layers structure and detection of the dynamic processes in the upper ocean layer by shipborne lidar. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 1998, 19(4), 707–715. doi:10.1080/014311698215946

9. Glukhov V.A., Goldin Yu.A., Rodionov M.A. Method of internal waves registration by lidar sounding in case of waters with two-layer stratification of hydrooptical characteristics. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2021, 14(3), 86–97 (In Russian). doi:10.7868/S2073667321030084

10. Hoge F.E., Wright C.W., Krabill W.B., Buntzen R.R., Gilbert G.D., Swift R.N., Berry R.E. Airborne lidar detection of subsurface oceanic scattering layers. Applied Optics. 1988, 27(19), 3969–3977. doi:10.1364/AO.27.003969

11. Goldin Y.A., Gureev B.A., Ventskut Y.I. Shipboard polarized lidar for seawater column sounding. Proccedings SPIE. Current Research on Remote Sensing, Laser Probing, and Imagery in Natural Waters (13 April 2007). 2007, 6615, 152–159. doi:10.1117/12.740466

12. Goldin Yu.A., Rodionov M.A., Gureev B.A., Glukhov V.A. Marine polarization lidar PLD‑1. Proceedings of XIII All-Russian Conference “Advanced Technologies of Hydroacoustics and Hydrophysics” (St. Petersburg, 2016). St. Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg Research Center of RAS, 2016, 215–217 (In Russian)

13. Glukhov V.A., Goldin Yu.A., Rodionov M.A. Experimental estimation of the capabilities of the lidar PLD‑1 for the registration of various hydro-optical irregularities of the sea water column. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2017, 10(2), 41–48 (In Russian). doi:10.7868/S207366731702006X

14. Goldin Yu.A., Rogozkin D.B., Sheberstov S.V. Polarized lidar sounding of stratified seawater. Proceedings of IV International Conference “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters (ONW’2007)”. Nizhny Novgorod, 2007, 175–178.

15. Khimchenko E.E., Serebryany A.N. Internal waves on the Caucasian and Crimean shelves of the Black Sea (according to summer-autumn observations 2011–2016). Journal of Oceanological Research. 2018, 46(2), 69–87 (In Russian). doi:10.29006/1564–2291.JOR‑2018.46(2).7

16. Serebryany A.N., Ivanov V.A. Study of internal waves in the Black Sea from oceanography platform of Marine Hydrophysical Institute. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2013, 3, 34–45 (In Russian).

17. Zimin A.V., Svergun E.I. Analysis of the characteristics and assessment of the expected heights of internal waves on the

18. Crimean shelf according to the expedition data in the summer of 2016. Proceedings of the Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “IV Feodosia Scientific Readings” (St. Petersburg, September 11–12, 2017). Feodosia, Art-Life, 230–234 (in Russian).

19. Lavrova O.Y., Serebryany A.N., Mityagina M.I., Bocharova T.Y. Subsatellite observations of small-scale hydrodynamic processes in the northeastern Black Sea. Sovremennye Problemy Distantsionnogo Zondirovaniya Zemli iz Kosmosa. 2013, 10(4), 308–322 (in Russian).

20. Ivanov V.A., Shul’ga T. Ya., Bagaev A.V., Medvedeva A.V., Plastun T.V., Verzhevskaia L.V., Svishcheva I.A. Internal waves on the Black Sea shelf near the Heracles Peninsula: Modeling and observation. Physical Oceanography. 2019, 26(4), 288–304. doi:10.22449/1573-160X‑2019-4-288-304

21. Astaf’eva N.M. Wavelet analysis: basic theory and some applications. Physics-Uspekhi. 1996, 39(11), 1085. doi:10.1070/PU1996v039n11ABEH000177

22. Zhegulin G.V. Using wavelet analysis to assess the relationship of hydrological and hydrooptical oscillations in the range of internal waves according to in situ observations in the White Sea. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2016, 9(3), 48–56 (in Russian).

23. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A. Savitzky–Golay smoothing filters. Computers in Physics. 1990, 4(6), 669–672. doi:10.1063/1.4822961

24. Koronovskiy A.A., Khramov A.E. Continuous wavelet analysis and its applications. Moscow, FIZMATLIT, 2003. 176 p. (in Russian).

25. Huang N.E., Wu Z. A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies. Reviews of Geophysics. 2008, 46(2). doi:10.1029/2007RG000228

26. Navrotsky V.V. et al. Internal waves and mixing in the shelf zone of the sea. Izvestia TINRO (Pacific Research Fisheries Center). 2010, 162, 324–337 (in Russian).

27. Navrotsky V.V., Lobanov V.B., Sergeev A.F., Voronin A.A., Gorin I.I., Pavlova E.P. Dynamic structure of cascading in the Peter the Great Bay (Sea of Japan). Oceanological Research. 2020, 48(3), 148–163 (in Russian). doi:10.29006/1564–2291.JOR‑2020.48(3).9

28. Dätig M., Schlurmann T. Performance and limitations of the Hilbert–Huang transformation (HHT) with an application to irregular water wave. Ocean Engineering. 2004, 31(14–15), 1783–1834. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.03.007

29. Ezer T., Heyman W.D., Houser C., Kjerfve B. Modeling and observations of high-frequency flow variability and internal waves at a Caribbean reef spawning aggregation site. Ocean Dynamics. 2010, 61(5), 581–598. doi:10.1007/s10236-010-0367-2


Review

For citations:


Glukhov V.A., Goldin Yu.A., Zhegulin G.V., Rodionov M.A. Complex Processing of Lidar Survey Data of Marine Areas. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2022;15(3):27-42. https://doi.org/10.59887/fpg/26nu-3hte-3n48

Views: 248


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6673 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5221 (Online)