Preview

Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics

Advanced search

Statistical Method for Evaluating the Efficiency of Matched-Field Processing

https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667321030047

Abstract

A statistical method for evaluating the efficiency of matched field processing is proposed, based on the evaluation of the probabilistic characteristics of random indicator SINR, the probabilities of which are distributed in accordance with the law of the minimum value of Gumbel. The statistical method is intended for processing data from field tests or model studies of sonar receiving systems. The evaluation of the probabilistic characteristics of indicator SINR is based on statistical analysis of the results of matched field processing in purpose to estimate the parameters of the distribution of this indicator in specific operating conditions of the sonar. Examples of the use of the method in modeling matched field processing are given in order to solve problems of comparing the processing quality under conditions of mismatch between the properties of model and real waveguides, as well as the presence of random errors when measuring the parameters of the waveguide. The simulation of the processing results was carried out using the SonarMFP software package, designed by SPIIRAS-HTR&DO Ltd to calculate the ambiguity function of the acoustic signal source as a result of matched field processing with using geographic information system technologies. It is shown that the obtained results allow us to quantitatively compare the receiving systems, operating under different conditions, using probabilistic measures. The method can also be useful when developing requirements for information support of receiving systems based on the principles of matched field processing.

About the Author

D. V. Chirov
SPIIRAS-HTR&DO Ltd.
Russian Federation

199178, 14-th Linia, VI, No. 39, St. Petersburg



References

1. Malishkin G.S. State-of-the-art of developing methods and processing algorithms for sonar signals matched with the propagation environment. Proceedings of XI All-Russian conference «Advanced technologies of hydroacoustics and hydrophysics». SPb., Nauka, 2012, 369—371 (in Russian).

2. Sazontov A.G., Malechanov A.I. Matched-field spatial processing of signals in underwater sound channels (review). Acoustical Physics. 2015, 2, 233—253. doi: 10.1134/S1063771015020128

3. Mashoshin A.I. Practical tasks of hydroacousics, solving by algorithms of signal processing matched with propagation environment (review). Fundamentalnaya i Prikladnaya Gidrofizika. 2017, 1, 37—48 (in Russian). doi: 10.7868/S2073667317010051

4. Intelligent geographical information systems for monitoring systems of marine situation / Edited by corr.-member of RAS R.M. Yusupov and D. Sc. in Engineering V.V. Popovich. SPb., Nauka, 2013. 283 p. (in Russian).

5. Mantzel W., Romberg J., Sabra K. Compressive matched-field processing. J. Acoust. Soc. America. 2012, 132(1), 90. doi: 10.1121/1.4728224

6. Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. Theoretical physics: Training manual, in 10 vol. V. 6: Hydrodynamics. 3-d edition. М., Nauka, 1986. 736 p. (in Russian).

7. Dyuldina N.I. Reliability of theoretical estimation of research results of sound propagation along routes for scheme moving source – stationary receiver. Materials of 4 All-Russian science-technical conference «Technical problems of research of the World Ocean». Vladivostok, IPMT DVO RAN, 2011, 180—184 (in Russian).

8. Ermolaev V.I., Leontiev U.B., Popovich V.V., Chirov D.V. Calculaton of the ambiguity function of noise source in underwater waveguides by matched-field processing, p. 1. Marine Radio-electronics. 2018, 3, 54—59 (in Russian).

9. Ermolaev V.I., Leontiev U.B., Popovich V.V., Chirov D.V. Calculaton of the ambiguity function of noise source in underwater waveguides by matched-field processing, p. 2. Marine Radio-electronics. 2018, 4, 38—40 (in Russian).

10. Vakar V.I., Vakar R.V., Konovalov V.Е., Popovich V.V., Chirov D.V. Results of field experiments on matched-field processing in a shallow water. Marine Radio-electronics. 2019, 4, 40—45.

11. Soares C., Jesus S. Broadband matched-field processing: Coherent and incoherent approaches. J. Acoustical Soc. America. 2003, 113(5), 2587. doi: 10.1121/1.1564016

12. Wang Q., Wang Y., Zhu G. Matched field processing based on least squares with a small aperture hydrophone array. Sensors. 2017, 17(1), 71. doi: 10.3390/s1701007113

13. Johnson N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributons, v. 2 / Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. 600 p.

14. Vadzinsky R.N. Handbook of Probability Distributions. SPb., Nauka, 2001. 295 p. (in Russian).

15. Gill F., Murrey W., Wright M. Practical Optimization. Academic Press, Inc. 1981. 509 p.


Review

For citations:


Chirov D.V. Statistical Method for Evaluating the Efficiency of Matched-Field Processing. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2021;14(3):47-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667321030047

Views: 124


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6673 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5221 (Online)