Preview

Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics

Advanced search

Study of the Characteristics of the Turbulent Boundary Layer by the PIV-Method under Laboratory Modelling of the Flow above the Seabed

https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667321020039

Abstract

This article is devoted to the development and application system for Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements of velocity fields in a turbulent boundary layer within experiments carrying out on the modified hydrodynamic flume of the Atlantic Branch of the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. This study is concerned with the preparation of laboratory setup for investigations on the initiation of motion of microplastic particles from the bottom covered with natural bottom sediment. The conditions of three types of bottom material (coarse sand (1–1.5 mm), amber grains (3–4 mm), pebbles (1–2 cm)) were investigated. The developed system of PIV-measurements uses a digital camera of medium framerate and continuous wave laser illumination. The experiments were performed in a wide range of flow velocities, up to 2 m/s, controlled by a pump rate and a control valve position. Average velocity profiles were measured, and the slope of their logarithmic part was used to calculate the corresponding friction velocity. The friction velocity and the bottom roughness are the crucial parameters for the assessment of sedimentation/initiation of motion processes. Friction velocities over sand and amber appear to be similar and significantly smaller than that for pebbles. The pebble roughness scale turned out to be the maximum, as expected. The amber simulated the bottom of intermediate roughness. For this case, due to its relatively low density (1.07 g/cm3), we observed the beginning of particle motion at velocities lower than those necessary for the initiation of sand grain movement. There was a good agreement between the observed threshold of motion for amber with available data obtained by A. Shields. The advantage of PIV-measurements for further investigations of the microplastic dynamics is the possibility of simultaneous measurement of almost instant velocity parameters in the boundary layer together with the observation of microplastic particles added at the bottom surface.

About the Authors

M. I. Vdovin
Institute of Applied Physics of RAS
Russian Federation

603950, Ulyanov Str., 46, Nizhny Novgorod



I. A. Isachenko
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of RAS
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



A. A. Kandaurov
Institute of Applied Physics of RAS
Russian Federation

603950, Ulyanov Str., 46, Nizhny Novgorod



D. A. Sergeev
Institute of Applied Physics of RAS
Russian Federation

603950, Ulyanov Str., 46, Nizhny Novgorod



I. P. Chubarenko
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of RAS
Russian Federation

117997, Nahimovsky Pr., 36, Moscow



References

1. Prandtl L. Bemerkungen über den Wärmeübergang im Rohr. Physik. Zeitschr. 1928, 29, 487.

2. Klewicki J., Falco R. On accurately measuring statistics associated with small-scale structure in turbulent boundary layers using hot-wire probes. J. Fluid Mech. 1990, 219, 119–142. doi: 10.1017/S0022112090002889

3. Balachandar R., Bhuiyan F. Higher-order moments of velocity fluctuations in an open-channel flow with large bottom roughness. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2007, 133(1), 77–87. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733–9429(2007)133:1(77)

4. Faruque M.A.A., Balachandar R. Roughness effects on turbulence characteristics in an open channel flow. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2010, 37, 1600–1612. doi: 10.1139/L10–098

5. Guala M. et al. Vortex organization in a turbulent boundary layer overlying sparse roughness elements. J. Hydraul. Res. 2012, 50(5), 465–481. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2012.729229

6. Qi M. et al. Roughness effects on near-wall turbulence modelling for open-channel flows. J. Hydraul. Res. 2018, 56(5), 648–661. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2017.1399931

7. Spiller S.M. et al. Form-induced stress in non-uniform steady and unsteady open channel flow over a static rough bed. Int. J. of Sediment Res. 2015, 30(4), 297–305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2014.10.002

8. Shields A. Application of similarity principles and turbulence research to bed-load movement. Hydrodynamics Laboratory. Publ. No. 167, U.S. Dept. of Agr., Soil Conservation Service Cooperative Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.

9. Hjulstrøm F. Transportation of debris by moving water. Recent Marine Sediments: A Symposium / Ed. Trask, P.D. Tulsa, Oklahoma, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1939, 5–31.

10. van Rijn L.C. Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries and coastal seas. Amsterdam, Aqua Publications, 1993. 690 p.

11. Shvidchenko A.B., Pender G. Flume study of the effect of relative depth on the incipient motion of coarse uniform sediments. Water Resour. Research. 2000, 36, 2, 619–628.

12. McCarron C.J., Van Landeghem K.J., Baas J.H., Amoudry L.O., Malarkey J. The hiding-exposure effect revisited: а method to calculate the mobility of bimodal sediment mixtures. Marine Geology. 2019, 410, 22–31.

13. Yang Y., Gao S., Wang Y.P., Jia J., Xiong J., Zhou L. Revisiting the problem of sediment motion threshold. Cont. Shelf Res. 2019, 103960.

14. Chubarenko I. et al. Behavior of Microplastics in Coastal Zones. Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments / Ed. by Eddy Y. Zeng. Elsevier, 2018. P. 175–223. doi: 10.1016/B978–0–12–813747–5.00006–0

15. Geyer R., Jambeck J.R., Law K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3(7), e1700782.

16. Ballent A. et al. Modelled transport of benthic marine microplastic pollution in the Nazaré Canyon. Biogeosciences. 2013, 10(12), 7957.

17. Waldschläger K., Schüttrumpf H. Erosion Behavior of Different Microplastic Particles in Comparison to Natural Sediments. Env. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53(22), 13219–13227.

18. Wilcock P.R. Methods for estimating the critical shear stress of individual fractions in mixed-size sediment. Water Resour. Res. 1988, 24, 1127–1135.

19. Sherman D. et al. Sediments and Sediment Transport. Treatise on Geomorphology / Ed. by John F. Shroder. Academic Press. 2013, 233–256. doi: 10.1016/B978–0–12–374739–6.00013–0

20. Hinze J.O. Turbulence: an introduction to its mechanism and theory. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1959. 586 p.

21. Wentworth C.K. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geology. 1922, 30(5), 377–392.

22. Sergeev D.A. A measuring system for studying liquid flows by the particle image velocimetry method based on a diodepumped solid-state laser. Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2009, 52 (3), 438–444. doi: 10.1134/S0020441209030257

23. Bolinder J. On the accuracy of digital particle image velocimetry system. Lund Inst. of Tech., Tech. Div. of Fluid Mech., Tech. Rep. 1999. 24 p.

24. Raffel M., Willert C.E., Wereley A.T., Kompenhans J. Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. 253 p.

25. Adrian R.J. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1991, 23, 261–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.23.1.261


Review

For citations:


Vdovin M.I., Isachenko I.A., Kandaurov A.A., Sergeev D.A., Chubarenko I.P. Study of the Characteristics of the Turbulent Boundary Layer by the PIV-Method under Laboratory Modelling of the Flow above the Seabed. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2021;14(2):29-38. https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667321020039

Views: 136


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6673 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5221 (Online)