Preview

Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics

Advanced search

Analysis of Mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin based on satellite altimetry

https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667319030067

Abstract

Translated by E.S. Kochetkova

We studied mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea. The automatic eddy identification and tracking algorithm were applied to satellite altimetry. Images of 166,000 cyclonic and 169,395 anticyclonic eddies were detected in the Lofoten Basin from 1993 to 2017, then the tracking procedure was applied to them. We analyzed tracks of long-lived (lifetime more than 35 days) individual eddies. They are 120 cyclonic and 210 anticyclonic eddies. We studied a spatial distribution of mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin as well as locations of their generation and dissipation. A statistical analysis of their characteristics also was carried out. We show that two predominant systems of mesoscale eddy formation exist in the Lofoten Basin. This fact may reflect two different mechanisms of eddy generation. The first one is the separation of eddies from the Norwegian current during its meandering. The second one is the direct generation of eddies inside the Lofoten Basin. There are three distinct areas of eddy generation in the frontal zone of the Norwegian current, from where eddies move to the west and north-west, forming three main trajectories. Anticyclonic eddies dominate in the area of the Lofoten vortex. Having arisen, they rotate intensively within the area of the Lofoten vortex in the anticyclonic gyre and interact obviously with the Lofoten vortex by merging. However, cyclonic eddies structures in the area of the Lofoten vortex are also found in a sufficient amount, and they are localized in the vicinity of two points with centers of 69.5° N, 4° E, and 70° N, 2.5° E. These cyclonic eddies are located in an area with cyclonic vorticity surrounding the Lofoten vortex like an annulus (shielded vortex). Mesoscale eddies that enter the area of the Lofoten vortex from outside are formed mainly in the region of the Norwegian current and tend to have the cyclonic rotation. We demonstrate that anticyclonic mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin are formed mostly in the frontal zone of the Norwegian current and decay not too far from the place of their formation, while cyclonic eddies can form in different places in the Lofoten Basin. The number of eddies is much smaller in the western part of the Lofoten Basin than in other parts of it.

About the Authors

V. A. Zinchenko
St.-Petersburg State University; Russian State Hydrometeorological University
Russian Federation

St.-Petersburg



S. M. Gordeeva
St.-Petersburg State University; Russian State Hydrometeorological University; Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

St.-Petersburg; Moscow



Yu. V. Sobko
Deutsche Telekom
Russian Federation

St.-Petersburg



T. V. Belonenko
St.-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

St.-Petersburg



References

1. Rossby T., Ozhigin V., Ivshin V., Bacon S. An isopyncal view of the Nordic seas hydrography with focus on properties of the Lofoten Basin. Deep-Sea Res. I, 2009, 56, 1955–1971.

2. Richards C.G., Straneo F. Observations of Water Mass Transformation and Eddies in the Lofoten Basin of the Nordic Seas. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2015, 45, 1735–1756. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14–0238.1

3. Bloshkina E.V., Ivanov V.V. Convective structures in the Norwegian and Greenland Seas based on simulation results with high spatial resolution. Proceedings of the Hydrometeorological Research Center of the Russian Federation. 2016, 361, 146–168 (in Russian).

4. Bashmachnikov I.L., Sokolovskiy M.A., Belonenko T.V., Volkov D.L., Isachsen P.E., Carton X. On the vertical structure and stability of the Lofoten vortex in the Norwegian Sea. Deep-Sea Res. I, 2017, 128, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dsr.2017.08.001

5. Fedorov A.M., Bashmachnikov I.L., Belonenko T.V. Winter convection in the Lofoten Basin according to ARGO buoys and hydrodynamic modeling. Vestnik S.-Petersbur. Un-ta, Earth Sciences. 2019, 64 (3), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.21638/ spbu07.2019.308 (in Russian).

6. Köhl A. Generation and Stability of a Quasi-Permanent Vortex in the Lofoten Basin. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2007, 37, 2637–2651.

7. Volkov D.L., Kubryakov A.A., Lumpkin R. Formation and variability of the Lofoten basin vortex in a high-resolution ocean model. Deep-Sea Res. I, 2015, 105, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.09.001

8. Isachsen P.E. Baroclinic instability and the mesoscale eddy field around the Lofoten Basin. J. Geophys. Res. 2015, 120(4), 2884–2903.

9. Belonenko T.V., Volkov D.L., Ozhigin V.K., Norden Yu.E. Circulation of waters in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea. Vestnik S.-Petersbur. Un-ta, Earth Sciences. 2014, 7(2), 108–121 (in Russian).

10. Volkov D.L., Belonenko T.V., Foux V.R. Puzzling over the dynamics of the Lofoten Basin – a sub-Arctic hot spot of ocean variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 4, 738–743. DOI:10.1002/grl.50126

11. Chelton D.B., Gaube P., Schlax M.G., Early J.J., Samelson R.M. The influence of nonlinear mesoscale eddies on near-surface oceanic chlorophyll. Science. 2011, 334, 6054, 328–332.

12. Monin A.S., Zhikharev G.M. Ocean Vortices. Usp. Phys. 1990, 160 (5), 1–47.

13. Petkilev P.S. Review of mesoscale eddy detection and tracking algorithms. Sovremennye Problemy Distancionnogo Zondirovanija Zemli iz Kosmosa. 2017, 14 (3), 129–149.

14. Nencioli F., Dong C., Dickey T., Washburn L., McWilliams J.C. A Vector Geometry-Based Eddy Detection Algorithm and Its Application to a High-Resolution Numerical Model Product and High-Frequency Radar Surface Velocities in the Southern California Bight. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 2010, 27, 564–579.

15. Faghmous J.H., Frenger I., Yao Y., Warmka R., Lindell A., Kumar V. A daily global mesoscale ocean eddy dataset from satellite altimetry. Sci. Data. 2015, 2, 150028. DOI:10.1038/sdata.2015.28

16. Chelton D.B., DeSzoeke R.A., Schlax M.G. Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 1998, 28, 3, 433–460.

17. Carton X.J. On the Merger of Shielded Vortices. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 1992, 18(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295- 5075/18/8/006

18. Tóth G., Házi G. Merging of shielded Gaussian vortices and formation of a tripole at low Reynolds numbers. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS. 2010, 22, 053101. DOI:10.1063/1.3428539

19. Raj R.P., Johannessen J.A., Eldevik T., Nilsen J.E.Ø., Halo I. Quantifying mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 2016, 121, 4503–4521. DOI:10.1002/2016JC011637

20. Raj R.P., Chafik L., Nilsen J.E.Ø., Eldevik T., Halo I. The Lofoten Vortex of the Nordic Seas. Deep-Sea Res. 2015, 196, 1–14.

21. Bashmachnikov I.L., Sokolovskiy M.A., Belonenko T.V., Volkov D.L., Isachsen P.E., Carton X. On the vertical structure and stability of the Lofoten vortex in the Norwegian Sea. Deep-Sea Res. I, 2017, 128, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dsr.2017.08.001


Review

For citations:


Zinchenko V.A., Gordeeva S.M., Sobko Yu.V., Belonenko T.V. Analysis of Mesoscale eddies in the Lofoten Basin based on satellite altimetry. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2019;12(3):46-54. https://doi.org/10.7868/S2073667319030067

Views: 198


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6673 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5221 (Online)