Regime of Reservoir: Experience in Modeling Riverbed Processes with a Movable Bed
https://doi.org/10.59887/fpg/peru-3z3h-gazh
Abstract
The paper presents the results of the interrelated calculation of the unsteady uneven movement of the river flow and the re-formation of the bottom of the largest flowing Kuibyshev reservoir in Eurasia in different phases of water content. These calculations are based on the hydrodynamic model “Wave” and algorithms for calculating solid runoff (analytical formula for sediment flow rate), changes in the transport potential of the flow and, as a result of the latter, changes in the bottom marks. In this case, the dynamics of the bottom marks is taken into account in subsequent calculations and is one of the arguments of the model. Based on the model calculations, the spatial distribution of bottom sediments in the water area of the reservoir was investigated and maps of accumulation and erosion of the bed in different phases of water content were constructed. It is shown that for the entire calculation period, an uneven redistribution of sediments in the reservoir is observed: erosion occurs in the upper part, and accumulation occurs in the middle and lower parts. In general, for the Kuibyshev reservoir, the contribution to siltation only by river sediment is insignificant. On average, over the 150-day modeling period for the entire reservoir water area, sediment accumulation is 0.5 mm/period. The weak dynamics of currents in the vast water area of the reservoir reaches does not contribute to active channel transformations. The most intensive processes of bottom transformation occur in places of narrowing of the water area, where the contribution of the non-stationary regime to the formation of the bottom relief during the rise and fall of the flood is best expressed. More full-flowing years will also lead to a more intensive redistribution of solid runoff and bottom sediments coming from the upper strata.
Supporting agencies: Работа выполнена при финансовом обеспечении за счет средств Федерального бюджета в рамках тем: № 1021060107175-5-1.6.19 (ИЭВБ РАН — филиал СамНЦ РАН) и № 0154-2019-0003 (ИНОЗ РАН — СПб ФИЦ РАН).
About the Authors
A. V. Rakhuba
Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS, Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
445003, Komzina, 10, Togliatti
M. V. Shmakova
Institute of Limnology RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
196105, Sevastyanova, 9, St. Petersburg
References
1. Kerssens P.J.M., van Rijn L.C. Model for non-steady suspended sediment transport. Project Engineers Delft hydraulics laboratory. Delft, Netherlands, 1977. 8 p.
2. Van Rijn L.C. Sedimentation of dredged channels by currents and waves. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering. 1986, 112, 5, 541–559.
3. Nicolas A.P. Modeling and monitoring flow and suspended sediment transport in lowland river flood plain environments. Erosion and Sediment transport Measurement in River: Technological and Methodological Advances (Proceedings of the Oslo Workshop, June 2002). IAHS Publ. 2003. 283 p.
4. Singh V. Two-dimensional sediment transport model using parallel computers. B. Tech. Banaras Hindu University, India, 2002. 109 p.
5. Wu Weiming. Computational River Dynamics. CRC Press, 2007. 509 p.
6. Khabidov A. Sh., Leontiev I.O., Marusin K.V., Shlychkov V.A., Savkin V.M., Kuskovsky V.S. Managing the condition of reservoir shores. Novosibirsk, Izd-vo SO RAN, 2009. 239 p. (in Russian).
7. Sanchez A., Wu W. A non-equilibrium sediment transport model for coastal inlets and navigation channels. In: Roberts T.M., Rosati J.D., and Wang P. (eds.). Proceedings, Symposium to Honor Dr. Nicholas C. Kraus. Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue. 2011, 59, 39–48.
8. Potapov I.I., Snigur K.S. Modeling of the evolution of the sand-gravel bottom of the channel in a one-dimensional approximation. Komp’yuternye Issledovaniya i Modelirovanie. 2015, 7 (2), 315–328 (in Russian).
9. GeoniCS Каналы и реки (Aquaterra). 2013. URL: http://www.csoft.ru/catalog/soft/aquaterra/aquaterra-2013.html (Accessed: 04.02.2022).
10. DHI. http://www.dhigroup.com (Accessed: 04.02.2022).
11. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual (CPD-69). Gary W., Brunner. Version 4.1. January 2010. 411 p.
12. SOBEK Suite. URL: https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/sobek/ (Accessed: 04.02.2022).
13. Lepihin A.P., Tiunov A.A. Modern hydrodynamic models of riverbed processes. Vodnoye Hozyajstvo Rossii: Problemy, Tekhnologii, Upravlenie. 2019, 4, 114–143 (in Russian). doi:10.35567/1999-4508-2019-4-6
14. Berger R.C., Tate J.N., Brown G.L., Savant G. Adaptive Hydraulics (AdH) Version 4.5. Hydrodynamic User Manual. January. 2015.
15. Delft3D-FLOW Simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments. User Manual. January 12, 2011. Delft Deltares. 672 p.
16. Reference Manual «RiverFlow2D Two-Dimensional River Dynamics Model», August, 2016, Hydronia LLC. 229 p.
17. Kuibyshev reservoir / Ed. A.V. Monakov. Leningrad, Nauka, 1983. 214 p. (in Russian).
18. Shirokov V.M. Formation of modern bottom sediments in the Kuibyshev reservoir. Trudy Kujbyshevskoy Gidrometeorologicheskoy Observatorii. 1965, 5, 28–32 (in Russian).
19. Zakonnov V.V., Zakonnova A.V., Cvetkov A.I., SHerysheva N.G. Hydrodynamic processes and their role in the formation of bottom sediments in reservoirs of the Volga-Kama cascade. Trudy IBVV RAN. 2018, 81 (84), 35–46 (In Russian). doi:10.24411/0320-3557-2018-1-0004
20. Rakhuba A.V. Experience of using the measuring and computing system “Chiton-Wave” in hydroecological studies of the coastal water area of Togliatti. Ekologicheskie Problemy Promyshlennyh Gorodov. Saratov, 2017, 484–488 (in Russian).
21. Shmakova M.V. Calculations of solid river flow and reservoir siltation. SPb., Izdatel’stvo VVM, 2018. 149 p. (in Russian).
22. Marchuk G.I. Methods of computational mathematics. Moscow, Nauka, 1989. 608 p. (In Russian).
23. Volcinger N.E., Pyaskovskij R.V. Shallow water theory. Oceanological problems and numerical methods. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1977. 207 p. (in Russian).
24. Rakhuba A.V., Shmakova M.V., Kondratiev S.A. Numerical modeling of mass transfer in a flowing reservoir. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2021, 14 (2), 89–97 (in Russian). doi.10.7868/S2073667321020088
25. Kondratiev S.A., Shmakova M.V., Ignatieva N.V., Ivanova E.V., Guzevaty V.V. Experimental and model studies of the distribution of the waters of the Izhora River in the bed of the Neva River. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2020, 13 (3), 83–92 (in Russian). doi:10.7868/S2073667320030077
26. Rakhuba A.V., Shmakova M.V. Numerical simulation of siltation of the near-dam ples of the Kuibyshev reservoir by river sediments. Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya. 2018, 1, 68–75 (in Russian).
27. Alekseevskij N.I., Berkovich K.M., CHalov R.S., CHalov S.R. Spatial and temporal variability of channel deformations on Russian rivers. Geografiya i Prirodnye Resursy. 2012, 3, 13–21 (in Russian).
28. Stupishin A.V., Trofimov A.M., SHirokov V.M. Geographical features of the formation of the banks and the bed of the Kuibyshev reservoir. Kazan’, Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1981. 184 p. (in Russian).
29. Changes in reservoir levels of HPPs RusHydro. URL: http://www.rushydro.ru/hydrology/informer/ (Accessed: 17.12.2018).
30. Hydrological Yearbook 2015. Vol. 1 Issue. 24, ch. 1–2. River basin Volga (middle and lower reaches) and the Urals. Samara: Privolzhskoye UGMS, 2016, p. 318.
31.
Review
For citations:
Rakhuba A.V., Shmakova M.V. Regime of Reservoir: Experience in Modeling Riverbed Processes with a Movable Bed. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2022;15(2):138-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.59887/fpg/peru-3z3h-gazh
Views:
298
Email this article 