Preview

Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics

Advanced search

Model estimates of the contributions of interannual changes of climate and nutrient load to changes in the Lake Ladoga ecosystem in 1980–2020

https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2025.18(4)-7

EDN: MFYUFY

Abstract

Quantitative estimates of the Lake Ladoga ecosystem response to changes in climatic atmospheric forcing and external nutrient loads were obtained for the period 1980–2020. The estimates were obtained using the MITgcm three-dimensional hydrothermodynamic model combined with the SPBEM biogeochemical module adapted to the phosphorus-limited conditions of the lake.

Numerical experiments were conducted using the following three scenarios: 1) a reference scenario with realistic changes in the external nutrient load and atmospheric forcing for 1980–2020, 2) with realistic changes in the external nutrient load and the “average” intra-annual course of atmospheric forcing for this period, and 3) with realistic changes in atmospheric forcing and a constant external nutrient load equal to the average value for the period under consideration.

The results of the study demonstrate a pronounced dominance of the external nutrient load as the main factor determining the dynamics of the lake ecosystem characteristics in 1980–2020. The contribution of climate change to the highly deterministic linear trends of the change in winter phosphate concentrations, summer phytoplankton biomass, and annual phytoplankton production in the photic layer amounted to only 24 %, 10 %, and 21 %, respectively. According to the calculation results, there is a noticeable decrease in these characteristics of the lake ecosystem in the second half of the considered period 1980-–2020. At the same time, a noticeable (more than 20 %) compensating effect of climate change is noted for phytoplankton production, leveling out part of the effect of the decrease in nutrient load.

It is shown that non-diatoms, which make the main contribution (63 %) to the total phytoplankton production, strongly respond to climatic changes in water temperature in the considered period. Diatoms show less dependence on climate change, maintaining a close relationship with winter phosphate reserves.

About the Authors

A. V. Isaev
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS
Russian Federation

WoS ResearcherID: C-1370-2014, Scopus Author ID: 25641182000 

36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow, 117997 



V. A. Ryabchenko
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS
Russian Federation

WoS Researcher ID: R-3877-2016, Scopus Author ID: 7005479766 

36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow, 117997 



References

1. Ladoga. Rumyantsev VA, Kondratiev SA, editors. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya; 2013. 467 p. (In Russ).

2. Lake Ladoga and Sights of its Coast. Atlas. Rumyantsev VA, editor. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya; 2015. 200 p. (In Russ).

3. Current State and Problems of Anthropogenic Transformation of Lake Ladoga’s Ecosystem in a Changing Climate. Kondratiev SA, Pozdnyakov ShR, Rumyantsev VA, editors. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences Press; 2021. 640 p. (In Russ).

4. Letanskaya GI, Protopopova EV. The current state of phytoplankton in Lake Ladoga (2005–2009). Inland Water Biology. 2012;5:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082912040104

5. Petrova NA, Petrova TN, Susareva OM, et al. Specific features of Lake Ladoga ecosystem under the effect of anthropogenic eutrophication. Water Resources. 2010;37(5):674–683. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807810050076

6. Marshall J, Adcroft A, Hill C, et al. A finite-volume, incompressible Navier Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 1997;102(C3):5753–5766. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02775

7. Marshall J, Hill C, Perelman L, et al. Hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic, and nonhydrostatic ocean modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 1997;102(C3):5733–5752. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02776

8. Isaev AV, Ryabchenko VA, Konik AA. Reproduction of the current climatic state of the Lake Ladoga ecosystem. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2024;17(2):50–65. https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2024.17(2)-5

9. Savchuk OP. Nutrient biogeochemical cycles in the Gulf of Riga: scaling up field studies with a mathematical model. Journal of Marine Systems. 2002;32(4):253–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00039-8

10. Isaev A, Vladimirova O, Eremina T, et al. Accounting for dissolved organic nutrients in an SPBEM-2 model: validation and verification. Water. 2020;12(5):1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051307

11. Isaev AV, Savchuk OP, Filatov NN. Three-dimensional hindcast of nitrogen and phosphorus biogeochemical dynamics in Lake Onego ecosystem, 1985–2015. Part I: long-term dynamics and spatial distribution. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2022;15(2):76–97. https://doi.org/10.48612/fpg/e1m2-63b5-rhvg

12. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5). Available from: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5. (Accessed September 19, 2025).

13. Isaev AV, Ryabchenko VA. Model estimates of interannual variability of the Lake Ladoga ecosystem characteristics in the period from 1980 to 2020. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2024;17(4):32–42. https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2024.17(4)-2 (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Isaev A.V., Ryabchenko V.A. Model estimates of the contributions of interannual changes of climate and nutrient load to changes in the Lake Ladoga ecosystem in 1980–2020. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2025;18(4):94-104. https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2025.18(4)-7. EDN: MFYUFY

Views: 53


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6673 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5221 (Online)