Model Estimate of the Coastal Constructions’ Impact on the Hydrodynamic Regime of the Neva Bay Water Area Adjacent to the 300th Anniversary Park of St. Petersburg in August and December 2011
https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2025.18(3)-5
EDN: RIMLVR
Abstract
Based on a coupled high-resolution numerical model, changes in the current structure and wind wave field in the northeastern part of the Neva Bay adjacent to the 300th Anniversary Park of St. Petersburg caused by coastal hydrotechnical constructions have been analysed. Using August 2011 conditions, it has been shown that under weak winds conditions, the River Neva runoff is the main contributor to the formation of the current field in this region. The influence of coastal constructions is manifested in the destruction of an anticyclonic vortex near the hydrotechnical structure No. 3 and a in a decrease of current velocity from 15 cm/s to 5 cm/s. For December 2011 conditions, it has been found that under weak southwestern and western winds, the influence of coastal constructions is expressed in a decrease of current velocity by 5–10 cm/s in the beach zone of the park while maintaining the overall structure of the current field. During stormy westerly winds, typical of late December 2011, a considerable southward deflection of the Neva outflow occurs, reducing the outflow current velocity to 20–25 cm/s. At the same time, a current directed along the shoreline from the northwest to the southeast forms in the beach area. The influence of coastal structures in this case leads to a decrease in current velocity by 5 cm/s in the area between hydrotechnical structures No. 2 and No. 3, resulting in the formation of a stagnant zone. Analysis of the wave regime has revealed that coastal constructions create wave shadow zones, thus significantly reducing wave heights in their immediate vicinity, though the protective effect is limited to localised areas. The maximum decrease in wave activity due to the presence of coastal constructions is observed under westerly winds, while the minimum occurs under southerly winds.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. D. MartyanovRussian Federation
36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow 117997
A. V. Isaev
Russian Federation
36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow 117997
A. Y. Dvornikov
Russian Federation
36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow 117997
V. A. Ryabchenko
Russian Federation
36 Nakhimovsky Prosp., Moscow 117997
References
1. Ryabchenko V, Dvornikov A, Haapala J, Myrberg K. Modelling ice conditions in the easternmost Gulf of Finland in the Baltic Sea. Continental Shelf Research. 2010;30(13):1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2010.05.006
2. Martyanov SD, Ryabchenko VA, Rybalko AE. Modeling of sediment resuspension in the Neva Bay. Proceedings of the Russian State Hydrometeorological University. 2011;20:13–26. (in Russian)
3. Martyanov SD, Ryabchenko VA. Simulation of the resuspension and transport of bottom sediments in the Neva Bay using a 3D circulation model. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2013;6(4):32–43. (in Russian)
4. Martyanov S. Modeling of sediment resuspension in Neva Bay during strong wind events. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Baltic Symposium 2014 ‘BALTIC’; 2014; p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887882
5. Martyanov S, Ryabchenko V. Bottom sediment resuspension in the easternmost Gulf of Finland in the Baltic Sea: A case study based on three–dimensional modeling. Continental Shelf Research. 2016;117:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2016.02.011
6. Ryabchenko VA, Leontyev IO, Ryabchuk DV, et al. Mitigation measures of coastal erosion on the Kotlin Island’s shores in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2018;11(2):36–50. https://doi.org/10.7868/S207366731802003X
7. Martyanov SD, Ryabchenko VA, Ershova AA, Eremina TR, Martin G. On the assessment of microplastic distribution in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2019;12(4):32–41. https://doi.org/10.7868/S207366731904004X
8. Martyanov SD, Isaev AV, Ryabchenko VA. Model estimates of microplastic potential contamination pattern of the eastern Gulf of Finland in 2018. Oceanologia. 2023;65(1):86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2021.11.006
9. Kuzmina AS, Ershova AA. Contamination of sandy beaches with marine litter microparticles (the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland of the Baltic Sea). Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Zones of Sea. 2022;2:86–100 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22449/2413-5577-2022-2-86-100
10. Averkiev AS, Klevanny KA. Calculation of extreme water levels in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. 2009;34(11):741–747. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373909110065
11. Averkiev AS, Klevannyy KA. A case study of the impact of cyclonic trajectories on sea-level extremes in the Gulf of Finland. Continental Shelf Research. 2010;30(6):707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2009.10.010
12. Klevannyy KA. Hydrodynamical risks in the vicinity of the coast of Aleksandrovskaya–Sestroretsk in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Regional Ecology. 2013;1–2(34):38–45 (in Russian).
13. Klevannyi KA, Kolesov AM, Mostamandi MSV. Predicting the floods in St. Petersburg and the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland under conditions of operation of the flood prevention facility complex. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. 2015;40(2):115–122. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373915020077
14. Klevannyy KA, Smirnova ЕV. On maneuvering of water sluices of St. Petersburg flood protection barrier for reduction of pollution of coastal area. Regional Ecology. 2016;4(46):24–39 (in Russian).
15. Andreev PN, Dvornikov AY, Ryabchenko VA, Tsepelev VY, Smirnov KG. Simulation of storm surges in the Neva Bay on the basis of a three-dimensional model of circulation in the conditions of maneuvering by gates of the flood protection barrier. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2013;6(4):23–31 (in Russian).
16. Kantarzhi IG. Forecast of the dynamics of a sandy beach in complexed hydrodynamic conditions. Oceanology. 2023;63:905–914. https://doi.org/10.1134/s000143702306005x
17. Blumberg AF, Mellor GL. A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In: Heaps N, editor. Three-dimensional Coastal Ocean Models. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union; 1987. 208 p.
18. Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, Part 1. Model description and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1999;104(C4):7649–7666. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622
19. Nezhykhovskiy RA. The River Neva and the Neva Bay. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat; 1981. 112 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Martyanov S.D., Isaev A.V., Dvornikov A.Y., Ryabchenko V.A. Model Estimate of the Coastal Constructions’ Impact on the Hydrodynamic Regime of the Neva Bay Water Area Adjacent to the 300th Anniversary Park of St. Petersburg in August and December 2011. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2025;18(3):60-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2025.18(3)-5. EDN: RIMLVR























