Analytical studies of the dynamics of pocket beach
https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2023.16(3)-7
Abstract
The beach site is located in the utmost northeastern part of the Nevskaya Bay. A boulder dam is built on the western side, which, however, fails to protect the beach from the effects of waves that cause longshore sediment transport. The planned construction of transverse beach–retaining structures outlines in the “Water Sports Base in Primorsky District” initiative, might
change the current situation.
This study objective is to predict the evolution of the coastal contour resulting from the planned construction in the next few decades.
A natural analogue of such an artificial structure could be a pocket beach located between two natural promontories. The sediment equilibrium at this study location includes three main components: volumes of erosion, accumulation and bypassing. The results include the computed wave patterns and the movement of sediment along the shoreline. The lateral sediment transport diminishes notably over time, driven by the alteration of the shoreline contour and the reduction in the angle between the wave equilibrium and the coastal resultant. The erosion and accumulation volumes increase over time, but their rates slow down. The shoreline displacement becomes more prominent over time; however, the rates of erosion differ from accumulation. The shoreline is moving particularly fast in the first years after construction, and then the process slows down gradually. The introduction of artificial beach protection structures in the 300th Anniversary Park of St. Petersburg will considerably reduce both the pace of beach erosion and the affected area. However, the erosion process will not be completely halted.
About the Authors
I. G. KantarzhiRussian Federation
129337
26 Yaroslavl highway
Moscow
I. O. Leont’ev
Russian Federation
117997
36 Nakhimovsky Prosp.
Moscow
A. V. Kuprin
Russian Federation
129337
26 Yaroslavl highway
Moscow
References
1. Report 1290–2020.IGMI. Technical report on the results of engineering and hydrometeorological surveys. AO «Firma UNIKOM, 2020 (in Russian).
2. Leont`ev I.O., Khabidov A. Sh. Modeling the dynamics of the coastal zone. A review of current research. P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Institute of Water and Ecological Problems SB RAS. Novosibirsk, Izdatel`stvo Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN, 2009, 90 p. (in Russian).
3. Hanson H., Baquerizo Azofra A., Falqué A., Lomonaco P., Payo A. Contour–line models as tools for long–term coastal evolution. Jornadas sobre Avances en Ingenieria Ingenieria de Costas y Oceanografia Operacional, Real Academia de Ingenieria. 2004, 17–52. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4089.5524
4. Hanson H. GENESIS: A generalized shoreline changes numerical model. Journal of Coastal Research. 1989, 5(1), 1–27.
5. Kantarzhi I., Mordvintsev K., Gogin A. Numerical Analysis of the Protection of a Harbor Against Wave. Power Technology and Engineering. 2019, 53. doi: 10.1007/s10749-019-01092-y
6. Leont’yev I.O. Changes in the shoreline caused by coastal structures. Oceanology. 2007, 47, 877–883. doi: 10.1134/S0001437007060124
7. Badiei P., Kamphuis J.W., Hamilton D.G. Physical experiments on the effects of groins on shore morphology. 24<sup>th</sup> Int. Conf. on Coastal Eng. Kobe, Japan. 1994, 1782–1796. doi: 10.1061/9780784400890.129
8. Kantarzhi I., Zheleznyak M., Leont’yev I. Modeling and monitoring of the processes in the coastal zone of Imeretinka lowland, Black Sea, Sochi. Proceedings of Managing risks to coastal regions and communities in a changing world conference, 2017. doi: 10.31519/conferencearticle_5b1b943667afd8.23141830
9. Baloui Y., Belon R. Evolution of Corsican pocket beaches. Journal of Coastal Research. 2014, 70(10070), 96–101. doi: 10.2112/SI70-017.1
10. Short A.D., Masselink G. Embayed and structurally controlled beaches. Handbook of beach and shoreface dynamics. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons. 1999, 392 p.
11. Pranzini E., Rosas V., Jackson N.L., Nordstrom K.F. Beach changes due to sediment delivered by streams to pocket beaches during a major flood. Geomorphology. 2013, 199, 36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.034
12. Izumi N., Shuto N., Tanaka H. Instability of River Mouth locations in pocket beaches. American Society of Civil Engineers. Coast. Sed. 1999, 628–643.
13. Pranzini E., Rosas V. Pocket beach response to high energy e low frequency floods (Elba Island, Italy). Journal of Coastal Research. 2007, SI 50, 969–977.
14. Bruun P. The Bruun rule of erosion by sea–level rise: a discussion on large–scale two– and three–dimensional usages. Journal of Coastal Research. 1988, 4, 4, 627–648.
15. Leont’yev I.O. Changes in shoreline contour due to cross–shore structure in the sea coastal zone. Geomorfologiya. 2018, 3, 32–39. doi:10.7868/S0435428118030033
16. Report on research “Mathematical modeling of surges, currents, waves and bottom scouring in the Neva Bay and the mouth of the Neva River”. OOO “KARDINAL soft”, St. Petersburg, 2016 (in Russian).
17. Lappo D.D., Strekalov S.S., Zav`yalov V.K. Loads and effects of wind waves on hydraulic structures. Leningrad, VNII gidrotekhniki im. B.E. Vedeneeva, 1990. 432 p. (in Russian).
18. Leont`ev I.O. Morphodynamic processes in the coastal zone of the sea. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 2014. 251 p. (in Russian).
19. Expert opinion on the construction of the facility “Water Sports Base in Primorsky District”. Vserossijskij nauchno–issledovatel`skij geologicheskij institut im. A.P. Karpinskogo, St. Petersburg, 2021 (in Russian).
20. Kuprin A.V., Novakov A.D., Kantarzhi I.G., Gubina N.A. Local and general scours caused by tsunami waves. Power Technology and Engineering. 2021, 54, 6, 836–840. doi: 10.1007/s10749-021-01296-1
21. Kuprin A.V., Kantarzhi I.G. Types of scour from tsunami waves affecting hydraulic structures. Gidrotekhnika. 2020, 4(61), 48–50 (in Russian).
22. Ishihara K., Yamazaki A. Analysis of wave–induced liquefaction in seabed deposits of sand. Soils Found. 1984, 24 (3), 85–100. doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.24.3_85
23. Leont’yev I.O., Akivis T.M. The effect of a groin field on a sandy beach. Oceanology. 2020, 60(3), 412–420. doi: 10.1134/S0001437020030042
24. Leont’yev I.O. Evaluation of depth of closure on a sandy coast. Oceanology. 2022, 62(2), 258–264. URL: https://sciencejournals.ru/view-article/?j=okean&y=2022&v=62&n=2&a=Okean2202010Leontev
Review
For citations:
Kantarzhi I.G., Leont’ev I.O., Kuprin A.V. Analytical studies of the dynamics of pocket beach. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2023;16(3):93-105. https://doi.org/10.59887/2073-6673.2023.16(3)-7